Thursday, December 8, 2011
Final Week #2
Final Week #1
Saturday, November 12, 2011
Men Beware of Beautiful Beasts.
For my new media related article, I stumbled across an article from Time’s Techland regarding Facebook scams. According to a Daily Mail survey, men are more likely to be friend a stranger and share personal information, especially if the image on the profile is an attractive female. Images of buff/attractive men didn’t show the same results for women adding strangers. This isn’t surprising to me considering lonely men aren’t necessarily considering the possibility that the attractive female could try to scam him, but instead just wants to look at her pictures.
The article continues on explaining that people accessing social networking sites from mobile devices and other new technologies may also increase risk for fraudulent activity. I try my best not to access my Facebook frequently or on computers that aren’t mine. Though, this isn’t because I’m worried about fraud, but instead I try not to use the site often because I don’t enjoy it like I used to. There are some tips that explain what kind of things regarding a “stranger” trying to friend you should make you see ‘red flags.’ So, thanks to Keith Wagstaff for “Men More likely to Befriend Sexy Strangers in Facebook Scams.” This article can be found at: http://techland.time.com/2011/11/11/men-more-likely-to-befriend-sexy-strangers-in-facebook-scams/?iid=tl-main-feature
Enjoy,
~T
The World Wide Web
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Facebook becomes a Dogooder Partner!
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Blogging: Self Presentation and Privacy
The End of Books
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Navigating Technomedia
Navigating Technomedia by Sam Han covered a few main topics in a relatively short amount of writing. He spoke about a ‘digital divide’ between areas with different technological capabilities, discussed three historical eras of technomedia, and he spoke about the real time capabilities of broadcasting.
One main point Han makes is that there is a ‘digital divide’ between people who have access to the newest technologies and those without access to them because of their more rural location. This issue was even discussed by nations in Sweden during the United Nations’ World Summit on the Information Society in 2003.
The next main point Han presents in the chapter is regarding three eras of technomedia and their histories. The mechanical era refers to print media, printing presses, alphabet letters versus characters, and photography; he presents moralist photographers and scientist photographers as the two ‘brands’ that existed. Even film is included in the mechanical era. The next era of technomedia was the electric era. This era includes telegraphy, which first allowed text to defy distance and time by instantly being transmitted, the telephone, and even personal computers. The final era is the broadcast era; the era includes radio and television broadcasts.
An interesting subject Han discusses is in regards to static during broadcasts. The broadcast era brought with it live feed with real time capabilities, so even if the broadcast wasn’t live, seeing static made the audience believe what they were viewing was live.
~T
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Google+ to Eventually Surpass Facebook?
Friday, September 30, 2011
Just Like Me Only Better
This research paper was surprisingly interesting given it relates simply to the avatars, or characters a user creates in cyberspace. I found it interesting that so many of the studied users made their avatars similar to themselves in appearance because from my personal experience my avatars usually bear no physical resemblance to myself.
One new thing I learned from the article was that the username of a character was considered to be a form of identity expression. Because the creation of an avatar often means following certain presets, naming one’s avatar can be used to express the user’s self. This is also somewhat surprising to me considering most characters I see during online play have ridiculous (and sometimes) vulgar names for their avatars. I’m not sure what the basis for Second Life’s game play is, but if it is supposed to be a simulation of reality, this could explain the variance in avatar naming.
The most useful thing I read in the research paper was the authors’ belief that global hegemony affected the standards of avatar creation. The authors found that most avatars followed a Caucasian standard of beauty, with youthful characteristics, and were physically fit. This is useful because it shows that regardless of the creator’s culture, their avatar often reflected themselves, though with Caucasian standards of beauty in mind. This shows that the Western ideas of beauty are plaguing most peoples’ ideologies.
~T
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Technology and Society
Raymond Williams has written an article where he analyzed television as a cultural technology. He looks at different versions of cause and effect regarding technology and society, explains the history of television as a technology, and examines the social history of the uses of television as a technology.
One of the author’s main points is that we often fail to realize the specific meanings of how a technology has supposedly changed society. Williams argues that television hasn’t changed society, but instead several causes and effects could have changed society with the help of television. Television alters one’s perception of reality and in effect alters the reality we create by influencing our actions. Television is also a centralized entertainment medium and it centralizes our styles and behaviors because people all watch the same programming.
Another main point the author makes is regarding visual broadcasting’s contradictory issue pertaining to programs’ funding. Without sufficient funding, a program will lose creative possibility because they cannot hire the desired actors; use the desired special effects, etc to create their envisioned program. To resolve this issue, programs turned to advertisements and sponsors for funding. Those who fund their programs, as well as the producers and broadcast systems broadcasting their programs, in turn limit their creative possibilities because they will stop funding should they disagree with the messages of the shows. Oh the drama of art versus money.
~T
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Community Media
Community media is such an interesting topic. The chapter we read was interesting, insightful and engaging. I didn't think of describing media that was created to empower members of the community actually had its own name and category.
One of the main ideas discussed within the chapter was the general apathy of western nations regarding politics. The author explains that media is seen as both an advocate for democratic values in society and an undemocratic entity controlled by the elite. Supposedly, the media’s negative coverage of political representatives and politics causes decreased voter turn out and political action by society. I’ve definitely noticed this apathetic plague spreading amongst my American peers and believe the media does have an effect; Americans are more interested in consumption, sports, American Idol, and their physical appearance far more than they care about morality, social justice, or environmental justice.
Another main point from the reading explains that community media can/has become the means for many voiceless members within the community to express themselves. Community media works to combat against the historical methods mass media uses to obtain and retain power. I’m not personally affiliated with any aspects of community media, but this is also a new concept to me. I not only find it to be interesting, but I feel that it could be a direction I should look into after I graduate.
~T
Friday, September 23, 2011
Facebook Updates to New Newsfeed
Scary how a computer is now telling us, which posts by friends are newsworthy and in real-time, based on an algorithm and the amount of time that has passed since our last login. According to Rob Spiegel in TechNewsWorld, the new update made by Facebook on Wednesday is likely a more convenient setup, but people are often used to the way things always were and resist to even subtle changes with social networking sites.
One aspect of new media I find so fascinating is the ever-changing mediums used to present information. A newspaper has (and likely will) always appeared, smelt, felt, and worked the same as newspapers did many years ago. Yet, with new media, a social networking site could change hourly, even daily if the programmers thought necessary. New media is something that will leave those who cannot quickly adapt feeling lost when they revisit the medium after a six-month break. This could be considered a bad thing because it could alienate some users, but the instantaneous consumer society we live in today forces constant change to keep the attention of our easily distracted minds.
~T
Should you be interested in perusing this article yourself, try this link:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Facebook-Goes-Under-the-Knife-Again-73332.html
Friday, September 16, 2011
Quality of Online Relationships
This article was actually more of a research paper, which surprised me given the title and topic. Interestingly enough, the abstract directly states that there are not sufficient existing studies pertaining to this topic, so I guess my assumptions weren’t terribly unique. Even though this research paper had more data then I generally enjoy reading, the topic is timely, interesting, and somewhat surprising.
Something I learned from this article is that computer-mediated-communication differs greatly from face-to-face interactions due to the lack of influence one’s class and attractiveness has upon one’s cyber-self. I was surprised that age didn’t play a larger role in predicting usage of OSNS considering most teens and young adults I know have a Facebook profile, but most of my parent’s friends are not using social networking sites such as Facebook.
One of the most interesting sections I found was in regards to “Anxiety.” The portion that I found most interesting stated, “There might be many lonely and socially anxious people who heavily use OSNS to establish online relationships.” This portion struck me like a blast from the past because one of my closest childhood friends used to be extremely lonely and anxious throughout middle and high schools. He also harbored many online relationships (not simultaneously! =P Get your head out of the gutter) and spent lots of time at home alone on the computer; however, today he is more comfortable in social situations and he forces himself to leave home and meet people face-to-face. When asked what changed, he simply said, “I learned what worked and what didn’t online, now I get to test it in the real world.”
~T
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Medium is Message
Mcluhan seems to be as discontent with the ‘content’ of media as I myself often am. I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed this article because the first page seemed as if the entire reading was going to be bland.
One of main idea Mcluhan presents in the article, “The Medium Is the Message” is that technologies or media doesn’t change human activity, but instead it, “shapes and controls the scale and form of human association and action” (p. 203). He provides many examples, such as types of transportation, what an electric light is used for, or even modes of communication. I definitely agree with his explanations because today the internet hasn’t changed that people meet and communicate with one another, but instead the internet has changed how people may meet, how often they communicate (especially given the mileage between party members), and they way we communicate (f2f versus cyber-interactions).
The main point I think Mcluhan was trying to communicate throughout this article involves the affects media has on human thoughts and actions. He explains that because the general public is used to standards, uniformity, and continuous habits, people find themselves in situations where they are unable to adapt to a given situation because he/she is stuck in the usual or old ways that always used to work. I’m pleased he mentioned the cultural insensitivity of IQ testing and the fact that it doesn’t actually measure intelligence, but instead how well a person understands the culture that the test writers/graders belong to. The most interesting aspect of this point pertains to the subconscious effects media has on people; he explains that media doesn’t alter our opinions, but instead “alter sense ratios or patterns of perception” (p. 207), which I also believe is true because I sometimes am oblivious to the fact that I purchased a more expense product simply due to the brand name.
~T
Saturday, September 10, 2011
Man-Computer Symbiosis
I can’t believe how spot-on much of the Licklider article was with the assumptions he made regarding the relationship between computers and mankind. Over fifty years ago he could already see much potential for this relationship to be symbiotic. I’m also surprised by my own enjoyment while reading this article.
Something new I learned from the article was the idea of “real-time” problem solving with the help of computers as a goal (3). I never considered that programming must already be written for basically every situation should a computer be able to help solve technical problems.
An interesting aspect of the article was his assumption that books would not be stored entirely on computers, when in fact most anything that is printed can also be purchased or found online. So, he wasn’t on point with that statement, but he was correct in saying that books will forever be a great invention for humanity. I say this because I always prefer to read something that is printed versus on a computer’s screen; it is simply easier for me to read and understand.
Smart Lists to Group All Our Dumb People?
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
The Quality of Online Social Relationships
This article was surprisingly interesting given the amount of data and research presented. One of the main points argued by the authors is that online interactions are less likely to encourage the development of a relationship that will be sustained when compared with face-to-face interactions or phone calls. I do agree with this statement given the criteria used by these authors to label online interactions; their data mostly included emails and listservs, but video-chat as the form of online interaction is likely to be more effective than a telephone call. Video-chat would be as close as one could come to a f2f interaction; this is because one can hear the other party’s voice, like in a telephone call, and one may also be able to pick-up the other party member’s nonverbal communication signs such as: body language, facial expressions, movements, or even hesitations during the conversation. I know I feel closer to my “cyber-friend,” (whom I’ve never met in person, but had skype conversations with numerous times) than several of my friends I’ve met in the real world; I would argue this is due to the illusion of closeness caused by video chat.
Not only do the authors argue that online interactions are less effective for developing and sustaining relationships, but they also claim that listservs are less effective when a member’s goal is establishing a sense of belonging or identity with the group than a small group of people offline. I agree with the authors here because I consider myself to be far less connected with my Comm 101C classmates, (who all received the same listserv as me) than the any of the students I’ve ever had in f2f classes. The authors’ claim that lack of interactions through the listserv is exactly my reasoning for why I felt disconnected from my fellow online students two years ago.
~T